Joseph RwandaJoseph Rwanda
HomeWorkAboutResume
Hire me
Back to work
Live
2025
Featured

Outcome-Driven Agent Evaluation (Hive)

Evaluation patterns for agents that must improve real outcomes.

Exploration and extension of the Hive framework for outcome-driven agent development, focusing on how teams iterate when success is measured by business results rather than single-turn benchmarks.

Stack

Python
Agent Frameworks
Evaluation Design
OSS
Apache 2.0

Proof metrics

Repository
Public GitHub fork
Lens
Outcome loops vs. toy task accuracy
Use
Research and internal eval experiments

Evaluation scorecard

Production eval dimensions — how this system is judged before and after changes ship.

Evaluation lens
Business outcomes

vs. baseline: Single-turn accuracy

Score agent changes on operational impact, not reply quality alone

Iteration loop
Execute → measure → refine

Separation between agent execution, evaluation hooks, and policy iteration

Production gate
Pre-ship eval pass

Methodology applied before customer-facing agent changes reach production

Problem

Most agent demos optimize for demo-quality replies, not sustained reliability in production workflows.

Teams need structure for iterating prompts, tools, and policies when the scorecard is operational impact.

Solution

Worked with Hive's outcome-oriented abstractions to stress-test evaluation habits for agent systems.

Used the fork as a sandbox for methodology that complements production Claude agent work.

Technical deep-dive

Why outcome loops beat toy benchmarks

Most agent evals optimize for whether the model said something plausible in one turn. Production agents fail differently: they lose state, mis-route tools, or pass happy-path tests while breaking reconciliation under real data.

Hive's outcome-oriented abstractions force you to define what success means in business terms — fewer false positives, faster audit close, lower manual rework — and iterate against that scorecard.

How this complements WaybillAgent

WaybillAgent is the application proof; this fork is the eval discipline behind it. The same mindset — staged rollout, observable KPIs, verification before handoff — shows up in both the framework exploration and the production agent build.

Architecture

Outcome-Driven Agent Evaluation (Hive) — evaluation framework overview

Python framework surfaces for defining agent behaviors and measurement hooks.

Separation between execution, evaluation, and iteration workflows.

Outcomes

Sharper internal discipline for judging agent changes before they reach customer-facing products.

Public footprint in the agent evaluation conversation beyond application code alone.

Links & artifacts

GitHub ForkUpstream HiveContact

Related work

WaybillAgent

WaybillAgent transforms warehouse auditing from a multi-day manual process into an AI-assisted guided walk using phone capture and agentic reconciliation—flagship build for Anthropic's Built with Opus 4.7 hackathon (selected top ~500 of 13,000+ applicants).

Read case study

AIDC Barcode Toolkit

Open-source toolkit that packages real-world AIDC workflows so Claude Code can generate, validate, and reason about barcode and labeling tasks with domain-correct defaults.

Read case study

Discuss this work

Hiring or building something similar—reach out with context and constraints.

Email Joseph
Joseph Rwanda

Production AI Engineer | Remote · LLM agents & evals | Nairobi UTC+3

HomeWorkAboutResumeHireAI engineer in KenyaLinkedInGitHubVercelEmail

© 2026 Joseph Rwanda. All rights reserved.